The National Football League sentenced to suspensions D. J. Williams, a linebacker, and defensive lineman Ryan McBean of the team Denver Broncos for violation of steroid policy. These football players were suspended from 6 games. But they were not banned for application of steroids. They didn’t test positive for steroids or other prohibited medicines. They were accused in providing “non-human” urine samples to the officer of drug testing.
D. J. William confirmed that he had never tested for any forbidden medication during 8 years of his career. The linebacker noticed that he was proud of his records. The linebacker of the NFL noticed that he was also proud of his manner in that he conducted himself, being a sportsman.
Peter Schaffer, the defensive attorney for McBean, stated that the NFL had violated rights of the defensive lineman. He mentioned that since McBean had never tested positive for any banned product, the NFL didn’t have any right to ban him.
Peter Schaffer claimed that he wanted to make it clear that neither D. J. Williams, nor Ryan McBean tested positive for forbidden drugs.
A lawsuit was filed in Denver County Court against bans of these football players.
The players stated that the drug testing officer had violated some rules linked with the procedure of collecting urine samples.
Peter Schaffer noted that some similarities had been between his client and Ryan Braun. Braun won his appeal linked with his suspension from 50 games for intake of testosterone. Ryan Braun could prove that the drug testing officer Dino Laurenzi violated steroid policy.
As for Laurenzi, different anti-doping agencies defended and supported him. The WADA also supported him. It was confirmed that there was the same procedure of collecting and sending urine samples not only for the MLB but also for the WADA.
But as for the drug testing officer that collected samples of Williams and McBean, another attitude was displayed to him. He was fired by the NFL for improper doing his duty.
At the hearing the NFL administrators acknowledged that the drug testing officer violated the chain of custody for urine samples.
Nonetheless, the appeal on behalf of the football players was rejected.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий